How we write
Each article starts with a question you might have about a feed, an ad, a purchase or Renura. We use examples, calculations and sources to answer it.
A discount needs a full-price comparison. An explanation of an app setting needs the app’s documentation. To say a tool helps people, we need a study that tested that benefit.
We link to original research and official guides where possible. A platform’s guide tells us what that platform says it does. Our Renura guides describe controls we checked in the app.
A study can find a pattern across many people without explaining your particular purchase. If two things happen together, that alone does not show one caused the other. We keep those limits beside the findings.
Made-up prices and situations are labelled. They let you follow a calculation without mistaking it for a current offer or someone’s real order.
Reddit helps us find questions people ask in their own words. One person’s post cannot tell us how common an experience is. Read how we use discussions.
Renura’s controls do not prove that it reduces spending or that every pause arrives at the right time. We explain what we would need to test.
Renura writes these articles. They have no independent peer review, and each includes its date and sources.
Found something wrong? Email [email protected] with the passage and a source we can check. When a correction changes a claim, we should explain what changed.
The reading guide groups articles about feeds, ads, spending and the app’s controls.